Add more docs for Feature Layer
not complete, but progress..
This commit is contained in:
parent
f2fd88fc63
commit
db50895459
40 changed files with 998 additions and 14 deletions
36
docs/features/people/entry/batches.rst
Normal file
36
docs/features/people/entry/batches.rst
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Batches
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
Batches are a sort of hybrid of import/edit/export. They assume a
|
||||
certain "data set" will be brought into a dedicated workspace, using
|
||||
whatever (sometimes custom) logic, then the user previews the
|
||||
"results" before committing to it. See also :doc:`/data/batch/index`.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance one common type of batch is for new Customer entry.
|
||||
Maybe there is a web form which some users fill out to enter new
|
||||
Customer records, but in fact those go into a "queue" / batch and are
|
||||
not truly injected to the system proper until the batch is reviewed
|
||||
and executed by some (possibly more highly authorized) user. This can
|
||||
be helpful not only for workflow optimization but also custom data
|
||||
validation, and/or preventing duplicates from entering the system.
|
||||
|
||||
Another type might be for a periodic import to "sync" 2 systems which
|
||||
do not normally stay in sync. For instance if your POS and CRM do not
|
||||
stay in sync all the time, but maybe once a month you export the data
|
||||
from one system to Excel file, for import to the other. It is of
|
||||
course possible to make a Rattail "importer" (or "exporter" depending
|
||||
on your perspective) which could automate this. But for sake of
|
||||
better visibility and instilling confidence in the logic, you might
|
||||
prefer a batch.
|
||||
|
||||
In the above example the process might be like:
|
||||
|
||||
* export data from CRM to Excel
|
||||
* upload file as new batch in Rattail
|
||||
* preview the changes; execute the batch
|
||||
* which generates yet another file, e.g. CSV
|
||||
* which you then import to the POS
|
||||
|
||||
There are many possibilities here; for instance more likely the batch
|
||||
writes directly to POS when executed.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue