Updated new.py for creating Plone 3.5.5 Zope instances.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f82a0934d2
commit
e97782d05a
54
bin/new.py
54
bin/new.py
|
@ -96,9 +96,6 @@ class NewScript:
|
|||
shutil.copytree(folderName, destFolder)
|
||||
|
||||
uglyChunks = ('pkg_resources', '.declare_namespace(')
|
||||
wrongPackages = [os.sep.join(['plone', 'app', 'content']),
|
||||
os.sep.join(['.egg', 'wicked'])
|
||||
]
|
||||
def findPythonPackageInEgg(self, currentFolder):
|
||||
'''Finds the Python package that is deeply hidden into the egg.'''
|
||||
# Find the file __init__.py
|
||||
|
@ -112,15 +109,21 @@ class NewScript:
|
|||
# Is it a awful egg init ?
|
||||
for chunk in self.uglyChunks:
|
||||
if content.find(chunk) == -1:
|
||||
isFinalPackage = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
# Goddamned, there are exceptions.
|
||||
for wrongPackage in self.wrongPackages:
|
||||
if currentFolder.endswith(wrongPackage) and \
|
||||
not isFinalPackage:
|
||||
isFinalPackage = True
|
||||
isFinalPackage = True # It is not an ugly egg init.
|
||||
break
|
||||
if not isFinalPackage:
|
||||
# Maybe we are wrong: our way to identify egg-viciated __init__
|
||||
# files is approximative. If we believe it is not the final package,
|
||||
# but we find other Python files in the folder, we must admit that
|
||||
# we've nevertheless found the final Python package.
|
||||
otherPythonFiles = False
|
||||
for elem in os.listdir(currentFolder):
|
||||
if elem.endswith('.py') and (elem != '__init__.py'):
|
||||
otherPythonFiles = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
if otherPythonFiles:
|
||||
# Ok, this is the final Python package
|
||||
return currentFolder
|
||||
# Find the subfolder and find the Python package into it.
|
||||
for elem in os.listdir(currentFolder):
|
||||
elemPath = os.path.join(currentFolder, elem)
|
||||
|
@ -138,6 +141,33 @@ class NewScript:
|
|||
return elemPath
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
viciatedFiles = {'meta.zcml': 'includePlugins',
|
||||
'configure.zcml': 'includePlugins',
|
||||
'overrides.zcml': 'includePluginsOverrides'}
|
||||
def patchPlone(self, productsFolder, libFolder):
|
||||
'''Auto-proclaimed ugly code in z3c forces us to patch some files
|
||||
in Products.CMFPlone because these guys make the assumption that
|
||||
"plone.xxx" packages are within eggs when they've implemented their
|
||||
ZCML directives "includePlugins" and "includePluginsOverrides".
|
||||
So in this method, I remove every call to those directives in
|
||||
CMFPlone files. It does not seem to affect Plone behaviour. Indeed,
|
||||
these directives seem to be useful only when adding sad (ie, non
|
||||
Appy) Plone plug-ins.'''
|
||||
ploneFolder = os.path.join(productsFolder, 'CMFPlone')
|
||||
# Patch viciated files
|
||||
for fileName, uglyDirective in self.viciatedFiles.iteritems():
|
||||
filePath = os.path.join(ploneFolder, fileName)
|
||||
f = file(filePath)
|
||||
fileContent = f.read()
|
||||
f.close()
|
||||
if fileContent.find(uglyDirective) != -1:
|
||||
toReplace = '<%s package="plone" file="%s" />' % \
|
||||
(uglyDirective, fileName)
|
||||
fileContent = fileContent.replace(toReplace, '')
|
||||
f = file(filePath, 'w')
|
||||
f.write(fileContent)
|
||||
f.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def installPlone3Stuff(self, productsFolder, libFolder):
|
||||
'''Here, we will copy all Plone3-related stuff in the Zope instance
|
||||
we've created, to get a full Plone-ready Zope instance.'''
|
||||
|
@ -199,8 +229,7 @@ class NewScript:
|
|||
if not os.path.exists(subFolderPath):
|
||||
os.mkdir(subFolderPath)
|
||||
# Create an empty __init__.py in it.
|
||||
init = os.path.join(subFolderPath,
|
||||
'__init__.py')
|
||||
init = os.path.join(subFolderPath,'__init__.py')
|
||||
f = file(init, 'w')
|
||||
f.write('# Makes me a Python package.')
|
||||
f.close()
|
||||
|
@ -214,6 +243,7 @@ class NewScript:
|
|||
destFolder = os.path.join(
|
||||
destFolder, os.path.basename(packageFolder))
|
||||
shutil.copytree(packageFolder, destFolder)
|
||||
self.patchPlone(productsFolder, libFolder)
|
||||
|
||||
def manageArgs(self, args):
|
||||
'''Ensures that the script was called with the right parameters.'''
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue